Is Dexter: Resurrection Being Overrated?
Introduction
When Dexter: Resurrection premiered, fans were ecstatic. The long-awaited revival promised to heal the wounds of the controversial Dexter: New Blood ending and bring Michael C. Hall’s iconic anti-hero back to center stage. And judging by IMDb, the show is delivering, holding an average rating above 9.0 with several near-perfect episodes.
But here’s the question: Are these ratings an accurate reflection of the series’ quality, or are we witnessing nostalgia-fueled hype that clouds objective critique?
The IMDb Ratings Surge
On paper, Resurrection is smashing it. Early episodes scored 9.2–9.5, putting them in the same league as prestige dramas like Breaking Bad and Game of Thrones (at their peak). Fans flooded IMDb with 10/10 ratings within hours of release.
This enthusiasm isn’t surprising. After nearly a decade of mixed feelings about Dexter’s legacy, loyal fans finally got what they wanted: Dexter back in New York, darker and more calculating than ever. Add strong performances from Michael C. Hall and Peter Dinklage (as Leon Prater), and you’ve got a recipe for ratings gold.
The Reality Check: Critical Voices
While IMDb paints a glowing picture, critical reviews tell a more complex story:
- Entertainment Weekly called Resurrection “the least-bad Dexter spinoff,” praising its energy but criticizing reliance on familiar tropes.
- CinemaBlend pointed out sloppy writing in Episode 8, where Dexter ignored obvious red flags, behavior that feels inconsistent with his past caution.
- Fans on Reddit threads also flagged “over-enthusiastic ratings,” with one commenter saying: “I love Dexter, but let’s not pretend a dinner party of serial killers wasn’t over-the-top fan service.”
Fan Nostalgia Factor
The ratings surge may not reflect pure storytelling excellence but rather fan nostalgia. For many viewers, Dexter isn’t just a show, it’s a cultural artifact of the 2000s. Seeing Hall back in character is enough for die-hard fans to give 10/10 before the plot has even unfolded.
This nostalgia bias is common: revivals of cult classics (Twin Peaks: The Return, Prison Break: Resurrection) often see inflated ratings early, followed by a plateau as casual audiences weigh in.
Comparing Dexter to Prestige TV
To understand if Resurrection is “overrated,” we should compare it to truly top-tier TV:
- Breaking Bad built tension over years with airtight writing.
- Succession balanced satire with character tragedy.
- Dexter: Resurrection (so far) thrives on shock value and fan payoff, great fun, but less airtight than those benchmarks.
If IMDb scores suggest Resurrection is on the same level, that may be misleading. The show succeeds as a revival but doesn’t necessarily redefine television.
Where the Show Excels
- Michael C. Hall’s performance feels sharper than in New Blood.
- The New York setting adds grit and scale that Miami lacked.
- Leon Prater (Peter Dinklage) introduces a worthy foil, nuanced, charismatic, and unpredictable.
These elements do justify strong ratings, but perhaps not near-perfect ones.
Where It Stumbles
- Certain scenes, like the infamous “serial killer dinner party”, tip into spectacle rather than subtle storytelling.
- Dexter’s occasional carelessness breaks immersion for fans who admired his meticulous methods.
- The moral weight is intriguing but sometimes rushed, leaving arcs underdeveloped.
Conclusion: Overrated or Properly Rated?
So, is Dexter: Resurrection overrated?
Yes and no.
- On IMDb, the high ratings reflect fan passion and cultural payoff, not just flawless writing.
- Critically, the show has both triumphs and stumbles, sitting comfortably above New Blood but shy of Breaking Bad levels of excellence.
The truth lies in the middle: Resurrection is not the masterpiece IMDb suggests, but it’s a solid, thrilling return that reignites why audiences fell in love with Dexter in the first place.
Post Comment